Puffbox

Simon Dickson's gov-tech blog, active 2005-14. Because permalinks.

2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005

Code For The People company e-government news politics technology Uncategorised

api award barackobama barcampukgovweb bbc bis blogging blogs bonanza borisjohnson branding broaderbenefits buddypress budget cabinetoffice careandsupport chrischant civilservice coi commentariat commons conservatives consultation coveritlive crimemapping dailymail datasharing datastandards davidcameron defra democracy dfid directgov dius downingstreet drupal engagement facebook flickr foi foreignoffice francismaude freedata gds google gordonbrown governanceofbritain govuk guardian guidofawkes health hosting innovation internetexplorer labourparty libdems liveblog lynnefeatherstone maps marthalanefox mashup microsoft MPs mysociety nhs onepolitics opensource ordnancesurvey ournhs parliament petitions politics powerofinformation pressoffice puffbox rationalisation reshuffle rss simonwheatley skunkworks skynews statistics stephenhale stephgray telegraph toldyouso tomloosemore tomwatson transparency transport treasury twitter typepad video walesoffice wordcamp wordcampuk wordpress wordupwhitehall youtube

Privacy Policy

  • X
  • Link
  • LinkedIn
  • 25 Oct 2006
    Uncategorised

    Not a radical solution to 'us vs them'

    Any initiative which attempts to break down the ‘us vs them’ mentality in any business, and particularly the public services, has to be a good thing. (Engagement, Cluetrain, etc etc.) So I was initially interested to read about ‘an original approach to shaping better public services’, put forward by the National Consumer Council and the union Unison.

    It’s only when you read on that you discover that their idea of going ‘way beyond the usual consultation exercises, surveys and public meetings’ is to… um… organise a one-day workshop for 15 social housing tenants in Newcastle, and 10 local housing officers. I’m really not convinced that’s enough to constitute ‘tried and tested’. In fact, by their own admission, it was only the ‘beginning of a process’.

    Thanks to egovmonitor for the link.

Proudly Powered by WordPress