Puffbox

Simon Dickson's gov-tech blog, active 2005-14. Because permalinks.

2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005

Code For The People company e-government news politics technology Uncategorised

api award barackobama barcampukgovweb bbc bis blogging blogs bonanza borisjohnson branding broaderbenefits buddypress budget cabinetoffice careandsupport chrischant civilservice coi commentariat commons conservatives consultation coveritlive crimemapping dailymail datasharing datastandards davidcameron defra democracy dfid directgov dius downingstreet drupal engagement facebook flickr foi foreignoffice francismaude freedata gds google gordonbrown governanceofbritain govuk guardian guidofawkes health hosting innovation internetexplorer labourparty libdems liveblog lynnefeatherstone maps marthalanefox mashup microsoft MPs mysociety nhs onepolitics opensource ordnancesurvey ournhs parliament petitions politics powerofinformation pressoffice puffbox rationalisation reshuffle rss simonwheatley skunkworks skynews statistics stephenhale stephgray telegraph toldyouso tomloosemore tomwatson transparency transport treasury twitter typepad video walesoffice wordcamp wordcampuk wordpress wordupwhitehall youtube

Privacy Policy

  • X
  • Link
  • LinkedIn
  • 4 Sep 2007
    Uncategorised

    Live webchats: rarely chatty, rarely live

    Despite being personally responsible for the big news story to come out of David Miliband’s trip to No10 yesterday, I’ve never really been a big fan of ‘live webchats’. There’s an undeniable buzz at realising that your question held the attention of Mr or Mrs Celebrity, if only for a few brief moments. And I have fond recollections of the first live (telnet) chat I ever took part in, back in 1995 I think, during which I asked Sex Pistols svengali Malcolm MacLaren if he thought Britain was obsessed with its past (and he did). But there’s a problem.

    I don’t often think you get more by watching the responses being typed live, compared to reading the transcript later. So how do you make it an exciting live event? A couple of quick ideas… Webcam-style imagery, either stills or video. If the celebrity is there, let’s see him/her. Or how about taking a lead from Digg, and allowing the users to drive the selection of the next question?

    Disappointingly, I doubt either will ever happen. In reality, the celebs want to control what they’re asked. And for many, perhaps a majority, there will be an intermediary typing the answers – and quite probably giving the answers too. The truth is, a live webchat is generally neither truly a chat, nor truly live. (Although for what it’s worth, I hear Miliband is a notable exception on both counts.)

    Response

    1. ShaneMcC
      4 Sep 2007

      The Live Chat does have it’s place but I’m not sure it is for high profile politicians or controlling celebrities.
      We run I’m a Councillor Get Me Out of Here (sorry for the plug http://www.bigvote.org.uk, it’s a way of getting young people and cllrs talking) and we have both a Q&A section and a Live Chat section. The Q&A allows for a reflective and considered answering of questions whilst the Live Chat is a different experience. The young people are vociferous in demanding answers to their questions and the cllrs do their best to engage with them. It is hectic when a class of thirty arrive at once but when there are slightly fewer it builds into a proper conversation and exchange of views.
      It seems to me that the Live Chats on Number Ten fail on both counts. They are not a conversation – just a Q&A and without the time allowed for considered answers (although I guess being politicians they are swift at consideration).
      It seems to me that they use Live Chats because they can and because someone thinks it will look good but I would much rather see Miliband restarting his blog and engaging with the public using that medium.

Proudly Powered by WordPress